Exeges keeps every source you rely on in one versioned place, and records every conclusion your team reaches anchored to the passage that proves it. Documents, datasets, filings, and transcripts are ingested as versioned sources with structure intact. Every source is given stable coordinates, the way latitude and longitude anchor a point to a map.

Findings are made the way you already work. Ask a question in plain language and get an answer synthesized across the whole corpus. Turn an agent loose on a section and let it investigate. Run a deterministic pass and flag every occurrence at once.

Every finding, by human, machine, or AI, is anchored to those coordinates and filed in the record. It lives with the document, points at the text that proves it, and holds its position as the corpus grows and changes around it.

Three kinds of authors. One record.⌗

Deterministic passes flag whatever you need flagged. You choose what you’d like the system to automatically flag in a document. This could be anything - every citation, every mention of a name, every dollar figure, every image, whatever you like. If it can be identified mechanically, it’s flagged across the whole corpus at once, each occurrence anchored to its location. This creates the scaffolding the other authors build on.

AI agents file claims, and every claim must survive verification. Agent behavior is defined in a customizable cookbook. An agent’s finding is checked against the source excerpt it cites before it can enter the record. If an agent attempts to quote text that isn’t there, the whole write is rejected.

People adjudicate and extend. Analysts file findings with typed stances — support, dispute, question, validate — anchored like everything else, including to other findings. Disagreement isn’t a comment thread; it’s part of the record.

The jobs below are the same whether your corpus is regulatory, financial, operational, or clinical.

1. Change monitoring for critical documents and policies⌗

Know what changed in the rules of the game — and which of your conclusions survive it.

The highest-signal event is change — updated boilerplate in an SEC filing, new regulations, amended tax laws. Each new version is rendered into a change map, every difference anchored to the passages it touches. The system doesn’t just create a redline or alert for watched sections; an agent is dispatched to investigate changes and create an impact finding.

Because findings are anchored to the text, change arrives already joined to your record: every conclusion resting on what moved is re-tested, so you learn not just what’s different but which of your positions still stand, with proof either way. Monitoring runs across the whole corpus, so it also surfaces the wide, quiet movements: coordinated language shifts, new exceptions, changing priorities across many documents at once.

Defense doctrine and sanctions · financial filings and debt agreements · reimbursement rules and clinical guidance.

2. Blast-radius analysis⌗

“What do I need to care about now?”

Exeges models what sources do to each other, so a change arrives with its consequences attached. Search is a traversal of typed relationships, each one clickable to the text that proves it. Ask for document sections that meet a specific set of criteria, and you get it: “every provision that adds a requirement and rescinds an exemption” returns a proven set, selected by compound membership, ordered by document order. Plain-language questions land in the same place: sections open in the corpus with prior findings already visible on the passage the answer landed on.

Which entities does a changed clause expose? Which facilities does a policy update touch? Which procedures does a new reimbursement rule move into risk?

3. All-source case building⌗

Build the operating picture for a person, company, unit, supplier, or cohort.

A finding can be anything - an amendment to another document, text containing budget language, an opinion of relevance. Every finding is counted and mapped, so a corpus stops being a pile of documents and becomes an accounted-for structure. Every finding is anchored to its sources, so the case survives handoff, scrutiny, and time.

A dossier on an actor or network · a counterparty or issuer investigation · a provider group or claims pattern.

4. Institutional memory that compounds⌗

Every question your team ever asked, still verifiable years later.

Analyst and agent findings accumulate on the corpus, so provisional machine output stays distinguishable from validated conclusions and contested ground stays visible. When sources change, the findings anchored to them are re-tested so the record keeps up with the world it describes. New hires and new agent sessions inherit everything the team has established.

Demos are running now. Get in touch to see one.